← Back to Project Overview

Mapping Moral Valence of Tweets

NLP

BLM

Moral Foundations

Social Media

Cluster Analysis

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.09578

Overview

This project analyzes over 36,000 geo-located tweets in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder to uncover patterns of moral expression within the Black Lives Matter movement.

Using FrameAxis and the extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD), tweets are embedded in a moral space to explore the moral dimensions activated in online discourse.

Motivation

Method

The eMFD approach was developed to map language documents to moral frames, defined by a set of 5 distinct moral axes. GitHub Code Repository
Foundation
(virtue/vice)
Description (Virtuous Direction) Example Keywords
Authority/ Subversion Desire/need for beneficial relationships with hierarchies in society. respect, duty, obedience, rebellion, tradition
Care/ Harm Compassion towards victims and the vulnerable, anger towards those perpetrating injustice and harm. empathy, suffering, protect, violence, kindness
Fairness/ Cheating Desire for cooperation and gratitude for just and trustworthy systems and people. justice, equality, rights, fraud, fairness
Loyalty, Ingroup/ Betrayal Desire for cohesive groups. Instantiates group pride and anger at traitors. patriotism, unity, team, betrayal, allegiance
Sanctity, Purity/ Degradation Relevant virtues consist of being temperamental and pious and clean. purity, sacred, clean, disgusting, holy

Adapted from Moral Foundations Theory (Graham et al., 2013), which proposes that moral reasoning is structured by distinct psychological foundations.

Moral Foundation Embeddings
Tweets are mapped to embedding space based on eMFD terms cosine similarity with the moral frames (axes) defined by the embeddings of the embeddings of assoicated moral keywords.

Data

Key Findings

Discussion & Future Directions